Table 3. Management and oversight team
| Organization name | Team member details |
|---|---|
Government representative 1 (chair) |
Name and position of representative |
Government representative 2 |
Name and position of representative |
Development partner 1 |
Name and position of representative |
Development partner 2, etc. |
Name and position of representative |
Other |
Name and position |
A table with adjusted language to SNG is available in the Word template of concept note for SNGs assessments.
4.2 ASSESSMENT TEAM:COMPOSITION AND INPUTS
Describe the staff and consultants proposed for the assessment team, i.e. the team that will be performing the assessment, as well as the relevant areas of expertise required, including technical skills, languages, and local knowledge. Explain how the assessment team will be managed, and its relationship to the assessment management and oversight team.
Complete table 4, which summarizes inputs from the assessment team.
In the case of a set of SNG assessments provide that description for each of the assessment teams (i.e., the teams that will be performing the assessment) and also, explain the arrangement that ensure consistency among assessments.
Table 4. Assessment team’s input to the PEFA assessment
| Team member | Organization | Area of expertise | Preparatory work (no. of days) | Field work (no. of days) | Post–field work (no. of days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team leader: Name (where known) |
Example: Consultants Ltd. |
Example: Fiscal strategy and budgeting |
Example:10 |
Example: 25 |
Example: 30 |
Expert 1: Name (where known) |
Pefalia Revenue Administration |
Revenue management |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Expert 2: Name (where known) |
Pefalia Ministry of Finance |
Expenditure management and reporting |
5 |
20 |
10 |
Expert 3: Name (where known) |
Consultants Ltd |
Public sector audit and financial control |
3 |
5 |
5 |
PEFA Handbook Volume 1: The PEFA Assessment Process – Planning, Managing and Using PEFA
